Skip to main content

Beyond PFAS: class-based approach for toxic chemicals and plastics

Almost all plastics and chemicals are made from oil and gas, creating toxic impacts across their lifecycle. Microplastics, whether intentionally added to products or shed from plastic materials, not only contain harmful additives but absorb additional toxic chemicals in the environment, leaving a legacy of harm that is nearly impossible to undo. Meanwhile, chemicals in cosmetics, personal care products, packaging, and consumer products remain in use despite the existence of safer alternatives.

But states are turning the tide. Over a decade ago, states began phasing out toxic chemicals like certain bisphenols, phthalates, and other toxic chemicals used in products, initially focusing on products for children. In the past five years, states have expanded efforts to address toxic chemicals in cosmetics, menstrual products, and packaging. In addition, states are reframing plastics as a health issue, not solely a waste issue. Finally, states like Washington are using their existing authority to not only regulate harmful chemicals but to identify safer solutions as part of the evaluation process.

Chemicals and plastics: Uses and health concerns

As the chemical and plastic industry is projected to grow significantly, the potential impacts on the health of fenceline communities, workers, ecosystems, and consumers are an increasingly serious concern.

Many chemicals haven’t been tested for their effects on health and among those that have been studied, scientists are increasingly alarmed by the harms identified. Particularly troubling concerns include:

Anticipated toxic chemical and plastics policies and regulations 

This year, at least 18 states are likely to consider policies to address toxic chemicals and plastics. These states include Alaska, California, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Maine, Minnesota, North Carolina, New Jersey, New York, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Utah, Vermont, and Washington.

Map of the United States showing states in orange expected to take action on toxic chemicals and plastics beyond PFAS in 2026. Other states are shown in gray.

Prevention-based policies

States in 2026 legislative sessions will consider policies that protect health from plastics and toxic chemicals by eliminating toxic plastics (including microplastics), plastic additives, and toxic chemicals, particularly in personal care products.

These policies align with actions by major corporations such as Apple, Sephora, and Target, which have removed or set goals to remove harmful chemicals from products and to eliminate PVC and harmful plastic additives like phthalates and bisphenols from their products and/or packaging.

Prevention-based policies under consideration in 2026
  • At least 18 states are likely to consider 91 policies that would require disclosure and/or mandatory phase-out of toxic chemicals and plastics. These states include Alaska, California, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Utah, Vermont, and Washington.These policies address the use of harmful chemicals in packaging, textiles, children’s products, and tires as well as mandatory plastic reduction and reuse requirements.
    • Essential Elements addressed: Transparency and Banning the Bad
  • At least 16 states will consider 27 policies to eliminate harmful chemicals from cosmetics, personal care products, and menstrual products. These states include Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Utah, Virginia, and Washington. These policies address forever chemicals and other commonly used toxic chemicals in these products.
    • Essential Elements addressed: Ban the Bad
  • At least eight states will consider 19 policies specifically addressing toxics in packaging. These states include Alaska, Georgia, Illinois, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New York, North Carolina, and Washington. These policies require reduced plastic packaging and/or phase out certain classes of toxic chemicals as well as PVC and polystyrene.
    • Essential Elements addressed: Ban the Bad
  • At least eight states will likely consider 15 policies addressing microplastics. These states include Alaska, Colorado, Hawaii, Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, North Carolina, and Vermont. These policies restrict intentionally added microplastics and/or require monitoring of microplastics in drinking water.
    • Essential Elements addressed: Ban the Bad and Transparency
  • At least five states will consider eight policies to address plastic grass (also known as artificial turf). These states include Maine, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, and Washington. These policies place limits on plastic grass installation and/or restrict the chemicals used in plastic grass.
    • Essential Elements addressed: Ban the Bad, Transparency, and Accountability
  • At least four states will consider 15 policies that will evaluate and promote safer solutions and/or prevent false solutions. These states include Massachusetts, New York, Vermont, and Washington. These policies address “chemical recycling” and/or require truth in labeling for recyclables.
    • Essential Elements addressed: Ban the Bad and Transparency

Accountability and pollution management policies

Accountability and pollution management policies under consideration in 2026
  • At least 13 states will consider 22 policies that focus on managing pollution from chemicals other than forever chemicals. These states include Arizona, California, Colorado, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Wisconsin. These policies include setting drinking water standards for emerging contaminants and/or requiring filtration on washing machines.
    • Essential Elements addressed: Transparency and Accountability